Musical Preferences Correlate Architectural Tastes: An Initial Investigation of the Correlations Between the Preferred Attributes
Despite a large number of discussions on the analogical and technical interrelations between architecture and music, very few studies have looked at the interrelations between the appreciations of the attributes among them. This study investigates the correlations between the preferences of architectural and musical attributes to reflect how they generally interrelate with each other. The considered visual qualities related to architectural forms are symmetricity, complexity, rhythm, pattern, and stress; and the considered musical attributes are related to the main four categories of Genres, perceived psychological attributes, five factors of music, and 3-Factors (arousal, valence, and depth). To discover the correlations, at first, a survey was designed to gather individual appreciations of the attributes. The responses were then filtered to remove the invalid ones before Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis unveils the relationships between every single considered attribute. In total, 5,184 correlations have been thoroughly explored, and a number of strong correlations were discovered and discussed in a classified manner; for instance, rap-followers showed higher satisfaction to asymmetrical building façade. This study also confirms some musical attributes are stronger reflectors of architectural taste, like rap, jazz, sophisticated, poetic music. Lastly, this paper confirms the significant effects of demographic attributes on the discovered correlations.
Keywords:architectural preferences, musical taste, preference correlations
Baker, T. J. (1996). Integritas : modern relationships between music and architecture. University of Washington.
Bandur, M. (2001). Aesthetics of Total Serialism: Contemporary Research from Music to Architecture. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=yd6rvMNbHGUC
Barnstone, D. A. (2015). Willem Marinus Dudok: the lyrical music of architecture. The Journal of Architecture, 20(2), 169–192.
Brown, B. J. (2014). Music, Landscape Architecture, and the Stuff of Landscapes. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), CENTER 18: Music in Architecture—Architecture in Music (pp. 152–167). Center for American Architecture and Design.
Buskirk, E. Van. (2015). Which Music Genres Have the Loyalest Fans? Retrieved from https://insights.spotify.com/at/2015/04/02/loyalest-music-fans-by-genre/
Fowler, M. (2011). Appropriating an architectural design tool for musical ends. Digital Creativity, 22(4), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2011.622286
Fowler, M. (2017). Architectures of Sound: Acoustic Concepts and Parameters for Architectural Design. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=eMA7DwAAQBAJ
Greasley, A. E., & Lamont, A. M. (2006). Music preference in adulthood: Why do we like the music we do. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, 960–966. Citeseer.
Greenberg, D. M., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., Monteiro, B. L., Levitin, D. J., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2016). The Song Is You: Preferences for Musical Attribute Dimensions Reflect Personality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616641473
Holl, S. (1996). Stretto house. Monacelli Press.
Holl, S. (2017). The Architectonics of Music. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, 39(2), 49–64.
Imaah, N. O. (2004). Music: A Source of Inspiration and Harmony in Architecture: An African View. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 169–182.
Kilicaslan, H., & Tezgel, I. E. (2012). Architecture and Music in the Baroque Period. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 635–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.215
Lippens, S., Martens, J.-P., & De Mulder, T. (2004). A comparison of human and automatic musical genre classification. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 4, iv–iv. IEEE.
Lopes, E. (2018). Most Popular Music Genres: It Is Completely Different Than You Believe. Retrieved from http://www.musicthinktank.com/blog/most-popular-music-genres-it-is-completely-different-than-yo.html
McKay, C., & Fujinaga, I. (2006). Musical genre classification: Is it worth pursuing and how can it be improved? ISMIR, 101–106.
Rentfrow, P. J., Goldberg, L. R., & Levitin, D. J. (2011). The structure of musical preferences: a five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1139–1157. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022406
Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: the structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1236.
Schäfer, T., & Sedlmeier, P. (2009). From the functions of music to music preference. Psychology of Music, 37(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608097247
Tayyebi, S. F., & Demir, Y. (2019). Architectural Composition: A Systematic Method to Define a List of Visual Attributes. Art and Design Review, 7(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2019.73012
Tayyebi, S. F., Demir, Y., Nemutlu, M., & Karadoğan, C. (2020). Graphical Layout of the Musical Preferences Studies: An Overview on How the Studies on Musical Tastes Are Conducted. Art and Design Review, 8(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2020.81002
Trachtenberg, M. (2001). Architecture and music reunited: a new reading of Dufay’s Nuper rosarum flores and the Cathedral of Florence. Renaissance Quarterly, 54(3), 741–775.
Veal, M. E. (2014). Warps, Ribbons, Crumpled Surfaces, and Superimposed Shapes: Surfing the Contours of Miles Davis’s “Lost Quintet.” In M. Benedikt (Ed.), CENTER 18: Music in Architecture—Architecture in Music (pp. 32–41). Center for American Architecture and Design.
Warren, C. W. (1973). Brunelleschi’s Dome and Dufay’s Motet. The Musical Quarterly, 59(1), 92–105.
Whittington, S. (2013). Digging In John Cage’s Garden: Cage and Ryōanji. Malaysian Journal of Music, 2(2), 12–21.
Xenakis, I. (2008). Music and Architecture: Architectural Projects, Texts, and Realizations (S. E. Kanach, Trans.). Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=fTYVAAAACAAJ
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Seyed Farhad Tayyebi, Yüksel Demir, Professor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retains full copyright of their article and grants non-exclusive publishing right to Advanced Journal of Social Science and its publisher “AIJR Publisher”. Author(s) can archive pre-print, post-print and published version/PDF to any open access, institutional repository, social media or personal website provided that Published source must be acknowledged with citation and link to publisher version.
Click here for more information on Copyright policy
Click here for more information on Licensing policy