Compressive and Flexural Strengths of Concrete Containing Ground Palm Kernel Shells as Partial Replacement of Cement

  • Esau Abekah Armah Department of Physics, University of Ghana
  • Hubert Azoda Koffi Department of Physics, University of Ghana
  • Josef K Ametefe Amuzu Department of Physics, University of Ghana

Abstract

This study explore the possibility of using waste ground palm kernel (GPK) shells as partial replacement of cement in concrete using mechanical destructive method has been studied. The palm kernel shells were in two forms: the GPK ordinary shells and shells subjected to incomplete combustion (i.e. the GPK “fuel” shells. In the preparation of the concrete specimens the mix ratio was 1: 2: 4 (cement: sand: stone) by weight and The replacement percentage was 0%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% and 60% respectively.  Concrete specimen were molded in both cubic and cylindrical form and its impact on the mechanical properties such as workability, compressive strength and flexural strength using destructive test method were studied. The cubic specimen were tested at 7, 28 and 60 days whiles the cylindrical specimen were tested at 7 and 28 days. Results of physical and chemical analyses suggest that GPK “fuel” shells have acceptable cementitious properties whiles GPK ordinary shells does not. Generally, the compressive and flexural strengths of concrete containing GPK shells decrease as the replacement percentage increases. However, the values of these properties increase as the period of curing increases. The optimum level of GPK shells replacement is 20% for the ordinary shells and 30% for the “fuel” shells considering compressive strength at 28 days for the cubic samples. For the flexural strength on the cylindrical specimen, up to 60% replacement of cement by GPK shells cured for 28 days has acceptable flexural strength. In spite of the findings that the GPK ordinary shells do not have cementitious properties, the mechanical properties on such concretes can be used in low strength constructions as pavements, walk ways and non structural domestic work at a lower cost than using cement.

Keywords: Cement, Compressive Strength, Concrete, Flexural Strength, Ground Palm Kernel Shells, Partial Replacement

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


  1. Newman and B. S. Choo, “Advanced Concrete Technology-Concrete Properties,” Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Great Britain, pp. 1/14-17. 2004.

  2. P. Adewuyi and T. Adegoke, “Exploratory Study of Periwinkle Shells as Coarse Aggregates in Concrete Works,” Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN), Journal of Applied Sciences Research, vol. 4, pp. 1678-1680, 2008.

  3. O. Oyejobi, T. S. Abdulkadir and A. T. Ahmed, “A Study of Partial Replacement of Cement with Palm Oil Fuel Ash in Concrete Production”, International Journal of Agricultural Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 619 -631, 2015.

  4. I. Umasabor and J. O. Okovido, “Investigation of the Compressive Strength and Curing   Duration of Binary Blend of Groundnut Shell Ash Concrete”, Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology (NIJEST), vol 1, no. 1, pp 75-80, March 2017.

  5. S. A. S. Manapurath, D. B. D. M. Sebastian and D. Philip , “Partial Replacement of Cement with Wood Ash,” International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering (IJSTE), vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 666-670, May 2016.

  6. H. Desai, “Experimental Study on Corn Cob Ash Powder as Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 724 -728, June-2018.

  7. K. Nagarajan, S. A. Devi, S. P. Manohari and M. M. Santha, “Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Coconut Shell Ash in Concrete”, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 3, no. 3, March 2014.

  8. Nivedhitha and M. Sivaraja, “Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Coconut Shell Powder and Egg Shell Powder,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJIRSET), vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8505-8510, May 2017. DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0605202 8505

  9. S. Rani and M. Tejaanvesh, “Performance of High-Strength Concrete Using Palm Oil Fuel Ash as Partial Cement Replacement”, Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 8-12, April 2015.

  10. Subramani and A. Anbuchezian, “Experimental Study of Palm Oil Fuel Ash as Cement Replacement of Concrete,” International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1-5, March 2017.

  11. K. Priya and V. K. Durga, “ A Study on Strength of Fibre Reinforced Concrete with Palm Oil Fuel Ash as Partial Replacement of Cement”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, vol. 7, no.7, pp. 14257-14263, July 2017.

  12. Premalatha, K. R. Vinodh, L. C. Anto and R. Nithiya, “Properties of Palm Ash Concrete”, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 29-32, August 2016.

  13. M. Sooraj, “Effect of Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) on Strength Properties of Concrete”, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 3, no. 6, pp 1-7, June 2013.

  14. A. Al-Majeed, D. H. Hameed and M. S. Al Mohnia, “The Effect of Palm Kernel Powder on Compressive Strength and Absorption of Portland Cement Mortar”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 213–223, October 2018.

  15. A, Fadele and O. Ata, “Compressive Strength of Concrete Containing Palm Kernel Shell Ash”, American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), vol. 5, no.12, pp. 32-36, 2016.

  16. W. Otunyo and A. G. Azuma, “Investigation of the effect of Palm Bunch Ash (PBA) on concrete properties”, Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Studies (JMESS), vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1141-1146, November 2016.

  17. O. Olowe and V. B. Adebayo, “Investigation on Palm Kernel Ash as Partial Cement Replacement in High Strength Concrete”, SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering (SSRG-IJCE), vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 48-55, April 2015.

  18. A. Olutoge, H. A. Quadri and O. S. Olafusi, “Investigation of the Strength Properties of Palm Kernel Shell Ash Concrete”, ETASR - Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 315-319, 2012.

  19. M. Mbadike and N. N. Osadebe, “The Use of Palm Kernel Hush Ash in Concrete Production, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63-67, 2012.

  20. M. Neville, “Fresh concrete”, Properties of concrete, Fifth Edition, Pearson Education Limited, England, pp. 698, 2011.

  21. Zongjin, “Fresh Concrete”, Advanced Concrete Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, pp. 107-114, 2011.

  22. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “General Knowledge”, Guidebook on Nondestructive Testing of Concrete Structures, Training Course Series No. 17, Vienna, Australia, pp. 7, September 2002.

  23. BS 1881 Part 116, “Method for Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes”, British Standards Institute, London. 1983.

  24. G. Nawy, Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook, 2nd ed, CRC Press, USA, pp. 11, 2008.

  25. Newman and B. S. Choo, “Fresh concrete”, Advanced Concrete Technology-Concrete Properties, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Great Britain, pp. 1/4-5, 2003.

  26. ASTM CI50, “Standard Specifications for Portland Cement”, American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003..

  27. S. Merritt and J. T. Ricketts, “Building Materials”, Building Design and Construction Handbook, Sixth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 4.3, 2001.

  28. EN 196, Part 6. “Methods of Testing Cement-Determination of Fineness”, European Standard, USA. 1989.

  29. ASTM C204 - 07 “Standard Test Methods for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by Air-Permeability Apparatus”, American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003.

  30. ASTM C188 – 09 “Standard Test Method for Density of Hydraulic Cement”, American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003.

  31. ISO 4013-1978(E), “Concrete-Determination of Flexural Strength of Test Specimen”, International Standardization Organization, Switzerland, 1978.

  32. M. Neville, “Cementitious materials of different types”, Properties of concrete, Fifth Edition, Pearson Education Limited, England, pp. 278, 2011.

  33. Neithalath and N. Schwarz, “Properties of Cast-In-Place Concrete and Precast Concrete Blocks Incorporating Waste Glass Powder”, The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, vol. 3, pp. 42-51, 2009.

  34. V. O. Hendrik, “Background Facts and Issues Concerning Cement and Cement Data”, Open-File Report 2005-1152, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S., pp. 13-14, 2005.

  35. K., Kirby, and H. M. Kanare, “Standard Reference Materials”, Portland Cement Chemical Composition Standards (Blending, Packaging, And Testing), U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standard Special Publication 260-110, Washington pp. 22, 1988.

  36. ASTM C618, “Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete”, American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003.

  37. Hirschi, H. Knauber, M. Lanz, J. Schlumpf, J. Schrabback, C. Spirig and U. Waeber, “Hardened Concrete”, Sika Concrete Handbook, Sika Services AG, Switzerland, pp. 102, December 2005.

Published
2020-05-03
How to Cite
[1]
E. Armah, H. Koffi, and J. Amuzu, “Compressive and Flexural Strengths of Concrete Containing Ground Palm Kernel Shells as Partial Replacement of Cement”, J. Mod. Mater., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7-16, May 2020.
Section
Research Article