A Predictive Model for the US Non-profit Market; A Macro to a Micro Perspective


  • Francisco J Quevedo Lubin School of Business, Pace University, New York
  • Andrea Katherine Quevedo-Prince School of Health Sciences, Pace University, New York




The Non-Profit Sector contributes almost $1 trillion to the US economy, representing 5.4% of GDP, and generating over 12 million jobs in 2017. Researchers suggest that a better understanding of the factors that affect fundraising would be of great interest to policymakers and fundraisers. However, the workings of the sector are subject of much debate. Some relate its size to the Theory of Government Failure, while others propose that government funding does have a positive effect on revenues. Some have suggested they swing with Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but others contradict this view and contend that macroeconomic variables do not affect short-run dynamics. Some research found that non-profit revenues react more to economic upswings than downturns, but nationwide organizations relate the ups-and-downs to certain events, as they influence public awareness. Predictive modeling overall has focused on big-donor analytics, aimed at identifying potential sponsors. Our research set out instead to define a working model for the US Non-Profit Sector. After an exhausting search, we located complete time series for an emblematic segment, the environmental cause, Factor Analysis allowed us to pinpoint the independent variables. We found that Non-Profit Revenues (NPR) depend largely on Public Awareness, as measured by TV coverage, and on Disposable Personal Income (DPI), specifically:

NPR = -4401.542 + 528.327(DPI) +23.121(TVCoverage) + Ɛ

We replicated prior research, which sought out relationships between macro-economic variables and NPR. That study had discarded the correlation between GDP and NPR as obvious, but did not explore DPI as the determining factor, and stuck to single variable searches, finding a correlation between the Standard & Poors index and lagged NPR figures, with a correlation coefficient of 0.636. Our model’s Pearson's R came up to 0.935, with perfect significance levels. Confirmatory Factor Analysis reaffirmed the fit of our equation, with an R² of 0.87.


Fundraising, Environment, Social Cause, Fundraiser, Non-profit revenue, Donor, Predictive modeling


Download data is not yet available.


<p>Ben‐Ner, A. and Hoomissen, T. (1992), An Empirical Investigation of the Joint Determination of the Size of the For‐Profit, Nonprofit and Government Sectors. <em>Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,</em> 63: 391-415.</p>
<p>Berman, G., Brooks, R. and Murphy, J. (2006), Funding the Non‐Profit Welfare Sector: Explaining Changing Funding Sources 1960–1999.<em> Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy</em>, 25: 83-99.</p>
<p>Bialik, K. and Matsa K. (2017). Key trends in social and digital news media. Pew Research, FactTank, News in the Numbers.</p>
<p>Čačija, N. Lj. (2013). Fundraising in the context of nonprofit strategic marketing: Toward a conceptual model. <em>Management, 18</em> (1), 59-78.</p>
<p>"Author Investigates Why People Give." <em>Chronicle of Philanthropy</em>, no. 18, 2005.</p>
<p>Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). <em>American Psychologist 45. </em>1304-1312.</p>
<p>Curry, J., Rodin, S. and Carlson, N. (2012) Fundraising In Difficult Economic Times: Best Practices, <em>Christian Higher Education,</em> 11:4, 241-252, DOI:</p>
<p>Daellenbach, K., Davies, J., &amp; Ashill, N. J. (2006). Understanding sponsorship and sponsorship relationships--multiple frames and multiple perspectives. <em>International Journal Of Nonprofit &amp; Voluntary Sector Marketing</em>, <em>11</em>(1), 73-87.</p>
<p>Greenaway, K. E., &amp; Vuong, D. C. (2010). Taking charities seriously: a call for focused knowledge management research. <em>International Journal of Knowledge Management</em>, (4), 87.</p>
<p>Leonhardt, D. (2008). What Makes People Give? <em>New York Times Magazine</em>, 44.</p>
<p>List, John A. The Market for Charitable Giving. <em>Journal of Economic Perspectives</em>. Spring2011, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p157-180. 24p. 2 Charts, 3 Graphs.</p>
<p>Matsunaga, Y., &amp; Yamauchi, N. (2004). Is the Government Failure Theory Still Relevant? A panel analysis using US state level data. <em>Annals Of Public &amp; Cooperative Economics</em>, <em>75</em>(2), 227-263.</p>
<p>Matsunaga, Y., Yamauchi, N., &amp; Okuyama, N. (2010). What Determines the Size of the Nonprofit Sector?: A Cross-Country Analysis of the Government Failure Theory. <em>Voluntas: International Journal Of Voluntary &amp; Nonprofit Organizations</em>, <em>21</em>(2), 180-201</p>
<p>McKeever, Brooke Weberling (2013). From Awareness to Advocacy: Understanding Nonprofit Communication, Participation, and Support. <em>Journal of Public Relations Research,</em> Vol. 25 Issue 4, p307-328. 22p. 1 Diagram, 6 Charts.</p>
<p>Ministerio del Poder Popular para Deporte y Recreación (2011), Ley Orgánica del Deporte, Educación Física y Recreación, <em>Gaceta Oficial No. 39.741, 23 de Agosto de 2011,</em> República Bolivariana de Venezuela.</p>
<p>Misener, K. (2006) Fundraising capacity in Canadian national sport organisations: relationship-building and gender [Paper in Special Issue: Sport and the Third Sector <em>Third Sector Review</em>, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2006: 41-61.</p>
<p><em>Mena Report</em>. (2017). Predictive Modeling for Fundraising. <em>US Department of Agriculture.</em> Bidding process concluded.</p>
<p>Mudura, M., Mudura T. and Secara O. (2015). Social Economy In Romania – European Perspective, <em>Annals of Faculty of Economics, </em>University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 599-604.</p>
<p>National Philanthropic Trust. (2016). Annual Report.</p>
<p>Nissan, E., Castaño, M., &amp; Carrasco, I. (2012). Drivers of non-profit activity: a cross-country analysis. <em>Small Business Economics</em>, <em>38</em>(3), 303-320.</p>
<p>Owens Erwin, C., &amp; Yarbrough Landry, A. (2015). Organizational Characteristics Associated With Fundraising Performance of Nonprofit Hospitals. <em>Journal Of Healthcare Management</em>, <em>60</em>(2), 96-112.</p>
<p>Sokolowski, S. (2013). Effects of Government Support of Nonprofit Institutions on Aggregate Private Philanthropy: Evidence from 40 Countries. <em>Voluntas: International Journal Of Voluntary &amp; Nonprofit Organizations</em>, <em>24</em>(2), 359.</p>
<p>Statista, available at <a href="https://www-statista-com.rlib.pace.edu/statistics/250889/">https://www-statista-com.rlib.pace.edu/statistics/250889/</a>total-amount-of-giving-by-foundations-in-the-united-states/</p>
<p>The Urban Institute (2015). The Non-profit Sector in Brief.</p>
<p>TVBroadcasting: <a href="https://www.tvb.org/Default.aspx?TabID=1903">https://www.tvb.org/Default.aspx?TabID=1903</a></p>
<p>Zappalà, G. and Lyons, M. (2006), Factors associated with fundraising dependency among nonprofit organisations in Australia. <em>Australian Journal of Social Issues</em>, 41: 399-417.</p>
<p>Wallace, N. (2016). Data and the Search for Big Donors. <em>Chronicle of Philanthropy</em>, <em>28</em>(10), 7.</p>
<p>Wooden, R. A. (2005). What Makes Donors Give. <em>Chronicle of Philanthropy</em>, (05) December 2005.</p>
<p>Yi, D. T. (2010), Determinants of fundraising efficiency of nonprofit organizations: evidence from US public charitable organizations.<em> Managerial and Decision Economis</em>, 31: 465-475.</p>







How to Cite

Quevedo, F. J., & Quevedo-Prince, A. K. (2019). A Predictive Model for the US Non-profit Market; A Macro to a Micro Perspective. Advanced Journal of Social Science, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.5.1.1-9